weirdexperiments.com

stories from the wilder side of science

blog

The Legendary Dr Fox Lecture - Footage Found!

Posted on September 23, 2011 at 7:45 AM

Several years ago when I first wrote about the famous Dr Fox lecture I thought the original footage was lost forever. When I recently learned that it is still around I tracked down one of the researchers Don Naftulin who was kind enough to send it to me. Below is an edited version of what has become one of the most unusual experiments in psychology.

You need Adobe Flash Player to view this content.

for more details read this extended chapter about he dr Fox lecure in The Mad Science Book by Reto U. Schneider:

 

The lecture that Myron L. Fox delivered to the assembled experts had an impressive enough title: 'Mathematical Game Theory as Applied to Physician Education'. Those responsible for running the University of Southern California School of Medicine's psychiatry department's continuing education programme had taken themselves off to Lake Tahoe in northern California for their annual conference and a continuing education program. There, Fox - who was billed as an 'authority on the application of mathematics to human behaviour' - presented the first paper. His polished performance so impressed the audience of psychiatrists, family doctors and general internists that nobody noticed that the man standing at the lectern wasn't really Myron L. Fox from the Albert Einstein School of Medicine but Michael Fox a movie actor who though having considerable experience in playing doctors in TV shows didn't know the first thing about game theory. (According to the Internet Movie Data Base Michael Fox was the reason Michael J. Fox from back to the future fame inserted the 'J' into his name, as the Screen Actors Guild only allows one person of each name to be registered).

 

Fox was trained to give this talk only the day before. He was given an article from „Scientific American“ on game theory and worked up a lecture from it that was intentionally full of imprecise waffle, invented words and contradictory assertions.

 

The people behind this spoof were John E. Ware, assistant professor of medical education and health care planning at Southern Illinois school of Medicine, Donald H. Naftulin associate professor and director of the division of continuing education in psychiatry at the University of Southern California School of Medicine and Frank A. Donnelly, an instructor in psychology at the University of Southern California.

 

„At the time a thing called ,experiential learning‘ was en vogue“, John Ware remembers, „it meant giving the people the experience of what you want them to learn rather than just telling them about it.“ One evening Ware saw an actor on TV giving a virtuous demonstration of double talk. As the subject of the upcoming faculty retreat was experiential learning, Ware had the idea of letting him give a lecture full of double talk and thus initiating a discussion on how to improve the educational program. As the particular actor was not available the researchers turned to Alex Seigel from the University of Southern California film program whom they knew from previous work. „We were training actors to act as patients in teaching psychotherapy to psychiatric residents and doing interaction analysis on psychotherapists‘ interactions from different theoretical schools of psychotherapy“, John Naftulin says.

 

One of the actors Alex Seigel proposed was Michael Fox. He was the perfect fit and by chance he had to go north to do a Shakespeare play in the same week anyway. „He just looked and sounded ,psychoanalytic‘ and authoritative“, Naftulin says. They didn‘t even change his last name. „It was a great name, Dr Fox“, John Ware says.

 

Michael Fox didn‘t think, he would make it through the lecture without being exposed. He had two reasons for being nervous: on one hand he had to give a lecture that was stripped from any real content on the other hand he was sure that most of the people in the audience had seen him before on TV. Fox had been a supporting actor in many Sitcoms, TV series and feature movies. He had played Dr Benson the vet of Inspector Columbo, Captain Ritter in „Hogans Heroes“ and Inspector Basch in „Batman“.

 

And really, when Michael Fox was sitting in the restaurant in morning before the lecture a women approached him thinking about where she knew him from. „She said, ,you look very familiar, when did you do your residency in New York?‘“ Ware remembers, „we thought, that was it.“ But then she left.

 

Still Fox was convinced he'd be rumbled during the lecture. But the audience hung on his every word and, when the 20-minutes-long talk was over, bombarded him with questions, which he displayed such virtuosity in not answering that nobody noticed.

 

On the feedback form that was handed round, all ten people who attended the lecture said that it had given them food for thought, while nine of them also reckoned that Fox had presented the material in a clear manner, put it across in an interesting way and incorporated plenty of good illustrative examples into his talk.

 

After Naftulin had explained Foxes role the audience was on alert. John Ware remembers that the next moring a physician from Oregon was showing slides of how he sets up his practice. „Someone got up and said ,it‘s a fake, you are just showing us a bunch of your old home slides‘. It was embarrassing because this was real.“

John Ware showed two other groups of people the video of the lecture - with much the same result. One person even thought he remembered having read some papers already by Myron L. Fox. In these instances as well, the audience wasn't made up of students but of experienced physicians, who had been dazzled by the actor's slick presentation.

The researchers conducted further more controlled experiments on larger audiences. The phenomenon in which the style of a lecture can blind the listeners to its poor content soon became known as the 'Dr Fox effect'.

These results raised doubts about the usefulness of teaching evaluation. When students were asked to fill out questionnaires assessing a class, these might actually be indicating little more than how much they liked the lecture along with 'their illusions of having learned'. As the authors wrote in their paper on the experiment, 'there is much more to teaching than making students happy'.

Nevertheless, there was one surprise that qualified this conclusion: when Fox's true identity was revealed to the audience, some of them asked where they could read up more about the subject. In other words, although the lecture had been unmasked as gibberish and a fraud, the panache with which it was delivered had nevertheless clearly stimulated interest in the topic. This led Ware, Naftulin and Donnelly to suggest an innovative method of increasing students' motivation: instead of giving lectures themselves, professors could train actors to deliver lectures for them.

A journalist later wrote in the Los Angeles Times: 'There are implications in this study, though, that even its instigators have not perceived. If an actor makes a better teacher, why not a better congressman, or even a better President?' Ten years after the hoax, Ronald Reagan was elected to the White House.


Categories: None

Post a Comment

Oops!

Oops, you forgot something.

Oops!

The words you entered did not match the given text. Please try again.

Already a member? Sign In

7 Comments

Reply Kapitano
12:35 AM on September 27, 2011 
I've known dozens of teachers at all levels - and I'm one myself. Some were so popular that students signed up to their courses on the basis of who was teaching, rather than what the student was planning to specialise in. The students always felt that they'd learned something, but even immediately after the lecture were very fuzzy on what.

It took me far too long to realise that the problem wasn't so much students not paying attention, or likable lecturers being unable to express themselves clearly, but lecturers genuinely believing things which made no sense, but presenting them using metaphors and stories which sounded like they meant something.

So it's not just conscious bullshitting of gullible students by smooth talkers - it's also teachers who don't know how much they don't know, passing on their confusion.

It may have helped that I took art history, and only read science in the library.
Reply Bo
2:22 AM on October 24, 2011 
I'd love to see a video of the entire lecture.
Reply Char Psychology Tutor:Mentor
7:47 PM on January 24, 2012 
When I was on teaching staff I realised that a group of lecturers at my school would laugh at and about students who admired their teaching methods, yet were unaware that they were learning nothing. Other student's, those really struggling, might be given platitudes. The philosophy was that 'not everyone can make it', waffling on 'makes them feel better'. They inspired my teaching to be the Opposite of their ways.
Reply edward
7:04 AM on July 17, 2012 
Thank You

The given information is very effective
i will keep updated with the same

web services
Reply whistle
4:24 PM on March 7, 2013 
An interesting document, but the video editing is extremely annoying with the constant interruptions. I too would love to see the whole unedited lecture!
Reply try
1:08 PM on July 20, 2013 
Reply Nate W
12:27 AM on October 11, 2013 
I'm pretty it's the same method that got a man who spoke of "Hope and Change"(2008) and "Forward"(2012), elected as president...

Follow retouschneider on Twitter

Facebook Fanpage Box


"The Mad Science Book" is the UK edition of the German bestseller "Das Buch der verrückten Experimente". The amazing stories of 113 strange experiments from the middle ages to today. Entertaining, mind opening, deeply researched, with original illustrations (the second volume has not yet been licensed for the UK or US. Foreign rights).

buy
(us)
buy (uk)
buy (ger)
other languages

Subscribe To Our Site

Quiz

"Do embarrassement researchers ask you to suck a pacifier in public?"

"Did Darwin play the bassoon for worms?"

Know the answers? Then you are ready for the mad experiments quiz.

Poll

The weirdest experiments

Visitors to this website voted for their favorite weird science experiment. The ranking:

1. The three Christs of Ypsilanti -Three men think they are Jesus. What happens when they meet?(1959)  full story

2. Diagnosing schizophrenics with spider webs (1955) full story

3. The hanging studies (1905) full story

4. Brilliantly saying nothing. Does anyone notice? (1970) full story

5. Staying in bed for one year (1986) full story

6. Crucifiying volunteers (1984) more

Editions

English

The Mad Science Book (Quercus 2008)
buy (us)
buy (uk)
buy (ger)

German

Das Buch der verrückten Experimente (Bertelsmann 2004)
buy


Das neue Buch der verrückten Experimente (Bertelsmann 2009)
buy

Dutch

Bizarre Wetenschap (Elmar 2004)
buy


Willen Weten (Elmar 2010)
buy

Swedish

De Galna Experimentens Bok (Fahrenheit 2006)
buy

Corean

매드 사이언스 북 (Puriwa Ipari 2008)

Polish

111 najbardziej szalonych eksperymentów (Proszynski 2009)
buy

Chinese

疯狂实验史(新知文库;) (SDX Joint Publishing Company 2009)
buy